Discussion about this post

User's avatar
sesquipedalianThaumaturge's avatar

I think you're overstating the impact of stealth aircraft on warfare a bit:

1. There are a couple types of stealth UAVs used for reconnaissance (like the American RQ-180 and the Chinese WZ-10) but this isn't a major use of the technology, in large part because the countries capable of producing stealth aircraft mostly do their strategic reconnaissance with satellites now.

2. Stealth aircraft often can't "track enemies from far away while being 'invisible' themselves", because to do that they would have to turn on their own radars, which would give away their presence. The F-35 tries to get around this with really good infrared imaging sensors, but those still have a limited ability to precisely track enemy aircraft at long distances. Also air-to-air missiles generally aren't optimized for stealth, so once you fire those your enemies will recognize they're being engaged.

3. Reflective stealth designs are less effective against the low-frequency emissions of large ground-based radars, so it would be hard for stealth bombers to achieve complete surprise in a strategic first strike against a capable adversary. Even Yugoslavia was able to detect and shoot down an F-117 using air defense systems from the 1960s.

More generally, there just hasn't been a war yet where a country using stealth aircraft went up against a peer competitor with modern countermeasures, so it's hard to know how well they would perform in practice. It's certainly a useful technology, but it hasn't been demonstrated to revolutionize conventional warfare quite yet.

Marcello's avatar

Looking at that picture of a stealth plane, it just hit me that stealth plane might be the aesthetic the Cybertruck is trying to copy. I wonder if that makes them harder to clock by radar speed limit enforcement, or whether the many-flat-surfaces aesthetic is more surface level.

15 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?